The Thomas Paul Murphy Music Player

"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Every pack of Cigarette's should include the following warning 08 29 2015

Every pack of Cigarette's should include the following warning 08 29 2015

16% of all lung cancer deaths from tobacco are from second hand smoke.

Or 16% of those who die from  lung cancer death due to tobacco do not themselves smoke.

Do you really love your children?

Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 08 29 2015 at:

When I see men trying to look cool smoking I think or mutter under my breath, "He can't think without a d1ck in his mouth."

Scott Walker ahs been Governor of Wisconsin for how many years?  And his wife works in something related to lung cancer?  Very odd that we don't see any new policies from him related to this?  It means:

1.  He doesn't listen to his wife.
2.  His wife just has that and it is just considered a job.  Why?  Because she can not influence him, in his position of power, to prevent further deaths.

One starts to wonder why should either of them be paid?  They do not appear to be acting in correspondence with the belief system required for their jobs.

I want to somehow blame this on England.  And also on Scott Walker having English descent.  But I can't quite make the premise connection.

When were mass production cigarette machines produced.
Who gets the money from them.
What did it have to do with WWII and WWI.
What are the EXACT birth defects from tobacco.
Was tobacco responsible for the fall of Egypt?
What forms of mental retardation does a baby exposed to tobacco have.
What is the mortality rate of a child of a tobacco user.
How likely is the son or daughter of a tobacco user likely to be an addict too.
What family surnames own the tobacco plantations.

It would seem to me with all the claimed research power in the United States that someone would think to research these things and document them.  They just view people as pieces of meat?  Because they are the mentally defective children of tobacco users themselves?  An intelligent human being would be a great threat to them the world over.

If we actually had responsible adult leadership in this country a warning like that would be on the label of every pack of cigarettes.  This is not a country of men today!

We also know that it causes arthritis. 

Could a tobacco company really pay for all the disability costs that it incurred?  Never.  It my world of personal accountability rather than limited liability it means that they have not earned any of their money.  And because they did not truly earn their money it should be taken from them and redistributed.

And the same goes to alcohol producers.

Do you see how one point of view is pro-humanity while the current entrenchment isn't?

And what happens when some old curmudgeon loses his wife due to cancer from tobacco?  He doesn't ever want to blame his own smoking for it!  He has to blame someone else in this world.  Who does he blame?  The person labeled schizophrenic in medical fraud.  But what is all this indicative of?  A spoiled belief system!  When one cannot attribute cause accurately to effect they have a spoiled belief system.  But not only is it closed minded; it is also mentally defective.  And mentally defective is the exact same thing as criminal minded.


Friday, August 28, 2015

The Institution of Psychiatry is the Dog Biting the Hand that Feeds it 08 28 2015

The Institution of Psychiatry is the Dog Biting the Hand that Feeds it  08 28 2015

Income leveling.

So the Founding Fathers wanted a Commonwealth.  Part of the framework of that is in the United States Constitution.  Senators were supposed to be profit centers.  A profit center was not just supposed to benefit one person it was supposed to provide for the needs of the people.  You know things that should be considered simple for a developed nation, clean water, clean air, solid roads.

Corporations initially led to American Prosperity until the Stock Market Fraud of 1929 and the World War that followed it.

The Corporation isn't that today it is more along the lines of a genocidal machine.

So how do you correct that to make it more in line with the United States Constitution.

First of all Limited Liability is not the standard of men; Personal Accountability for ones actions is.  Limited Liability is about as far away from the Standard of Men as you can get.

Second you need income leveling.  As profit centers are designed to meet the needs of the people.  This also defeats a subjective health care system.  Why?  Only the truly ultraistic human beings desire to heal the sick and become health care workers.  You can't have people in it for the money because it creates the worst form of genocidal corruption there is; medical fraud.  To disempower those who are a normal legitimate challenge to you.  Think of how many deaths there are directly related to pharmaceuticals every year?  Think of how the poor in the United States remain sick all their lives. 

In a Common Wealth you cannot have drunks creating mentally retarded children either.  The Puritans who founded this country knew that and only wanted people to drink in moderation so that they would know how to obey laws.  So somehow we are going to need to ADD something to our Constitution to bring that idea to bear.  The 18th Amendment was supposed to do that but FDR who looted the Stock Market in 1929, whose family money came from the opiate trade with China, who gave us the 21st Amendment which was illegal because it was not valid as to the intent and purpose of the United States Constitution nixed all that.  And gave us the Institution of psychiatry, essentially a Dog biting the hand that feeds it.

FDR could not have come into power if it were not for the Federal Reserve.  Back then the banks and stock market brokerage firms were one.  And short selling is the making a profit when stocks go down.  The short seller sells stock he doesn't not own at a high price and then when it goes down he buys it; and the difference between those two prices is his profit.  And that is indeed what fueled FDR's Presidential bid.  Also at that same time a man who was going to give us free health care named Huey Long (sp?)  was assassinated by a man of a German surname named Weiss.  This was in the south.  Where indeed the German influence was very brutal in beating down any slavery revolts.  Put this in the time frame of eugenics and World War II with Germany. 

But anyhow what I am getting at is all Corporate Profits should go directly into a commonwealth.

One of the benefits of this is that best technologies will always be used irregardless of patent ownership, this creates products that last rather than waste that piles up until it kills all of us.

So you get income leveling with that.  You also get new classes of people.

1.  Those who can learn and therefore work.
2.  Those who cannot learn to work and who do not have the proper personal hygiene to be around your food.
3.  And the hand that feeds the dog that the dog bit becomes the ruling class because it is indeed the source of mental cognition for those who claimed intellect, social skills, intellectual property that were all derived from that soul whose mind was interjected upon with cursing voices.  It has to be this way because you can't have a had running the show.  As much as a hag gleams a few things here and their from a demonized human mind she cannot be allowed to run the show and manage human lives.  Why not?  Because essentially she is a miserable and therefore unfair person.  And nor can a hags sons be allowed to manage; they do indeed suffer from the same cognition as the had does and it is a great source of personal shame for them.  The hag is only motivated to ruin the best works of men in civilization out of spite for what she is not and can never be.  And that ultimately leads to human extinction on the planet; but the hag doesn't care.  A hag is never made responsible for her own actions.  So indeed this is the doctrine of limited liability versus the standard of man; personal accountability.  With personal accountability the dog can not bite the hand that feeds it.

With psychiatry the hag wants you to believe that she and her brood actually thought of everything they stole from a human mind that they then sought to zombify with psychiatric drugs.

The metaphor in the Bible of everything comes from God is exactly the same as everything the mentally defective ever have in life including wealth comes directly from the minds that the hags cursed and demonized.

I can hear her crying now?

Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 08 28 2015 at:

At a certain point in a hags second person cognition she realizes that she isn't in any way doing the thinking of the person whose mind she has chosen to be a part of against their will.  And she hates epiphany that more than anything on earth.  To know that there are people in this world who are much smarter and capable than her.  That don't need her around.  Hence she desires to put those better minds on drugs.  The hag has bitten the hand that feeds her.


The next thing the Republican Party will do is mandate that they get to choose which Community women will suckle their Down's Syndrome Children 08 28 2015

The next thing the Republican Party will do is mandate that they get to choose which Community women will suckle their Down's Syndrome Children 08 28 2015

That would be an extension of their mandatory non abortion movement.

They will also say that they all get to gather around and watch.  Somewhat like Jews at a bris?

But what does the old Jewish proverb of when one member has an extra sack of grain he hides it on a neighbors lot really mean?  Isn't that really a metaphor for have as many children as you want and one of our families will take care of them?  We can always take in another child because it is like a sack of grain to us?  If you don't raise your children via your own cognition it really doesn't matter how many you have?

So indeed the Republican prolife movement is both communism and Jewish.

They will say that they get to choose who suckles their down's syndrome children in an eugenics effort to give them the best nutrients and head start?

Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 08 28 2015 at:

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Name one black community that is more "white" than a white community 08 27 2015

 Name one black community that is more "white" than a white community   08 27 2015

By "white" I mean behavior wise.

If equality is indeed true you would think that there would be at least one somewhere.  I would believe that there has to be one somewhere.

1. Responsible adults.
2. Clean and free of litter.
3. High education standards.
4. Low crime rate.
5. Safe to walk the streets at night.
6. Low noise level.
7. Do not fear gun ownership.
8. High level of competence regarding upkeep and fixing of things.
9.  No drunks, drug users or vagrants to worry about.
10.  Everyone relatively healthy and self respecting.
11.  Low level of loitering.

This is the standard of how I judge the Obama, Biden, Hillary and "media" years.

So if you can't think of one in the United States how about another country?

The gestalt that I get of all our current lineup of politicians and media is that of meddling clowns.  What do I mean?  People really not that well suited for what they are doing and therefore mindlessly messing it up without intention?

Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 08 27 2015 at:


The more water you drink the less hungry for meat you are 08 27 2015

What is the nature of 08 27 2015

What is the nature of 08 27 2015

Someone that is always providing reasons why people they know are normal shouldn't be happy?

Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 08 27 2015 at:

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

He could be perfectly happen 08 26 2015

He could be perfectly happen  08 26 2015

One day while working at the gas station I made a comment about how I felt sad for a person born with a physical birth defect.

The guy I was working with told me, "He could be perfectly happy being that way."

But, did he choose to be that way?  Would he choose to be that way?  Would you choose to be that way?

So the question that clarifies this is,

"Who chose for him to be that way?

I am getting into the nuances of adult responsibility here.

Did the parents who drank, smoke or used the drugs that caused the birth defects choose for that child to be that way?

Does the white collar criminal choose to commit a crime?

But what happens if we boldly state, "That persons parents chose for that child to be birth defective." ???

It isn't like not enough warning labels on products have been printed already over a very long period of time.

 But that is all I have time for.

Thomas Paul Murphy
Copyright 2015
Originally published on 08 26 2015: