"You might think that I am off base, but I am published by the Securities and Exchange Commission."

Thomas Paul Murphy

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Have you developed a CAFFEINE ALLERGY as you age 10 29 2014

Have you developed a CAFFEINE ALLERGY as you age 10 29 2014

I am telling you what I do; I am not giving you personal advice.

I am 47 and avoid Caffeine like the plague today!  But if I have some by mistake while I am in the phase of trying to avoid it completely, I have found that it is good to have some GABA around!  I might indeed keep some in my wallet in a packet like I do powdered aspirin.  Oddly enough the powdered aspirin has caffeine in it.  Some people die of caffeine toxicity and it is in energy drinks to an extreme level. I also believe that the elderly over the age of 70 should also avoid caffeine.  Perhaps 1/8 a cup of regular coffee is enough for them.  So tonight I had the jitters from too much caffeine and took a 1/8 teaspoon of GABA and it helped calm down that light feeling.  Now by all means see a Doctor or call 911 if you have the symptoms of caffeine poisoning.  But after you figure that out like I am figuring out it and don't want to go the emergency ward while they can't figure it out, I believe it is good to have GABA powder around. 

This is the one I have at home.

http://www.vitacost.com/source-naturals-gaba-powder

But as you can see there are numerous brands.

http://www.vitacost.com/productResults.aspx?ntk=products&ss=1&NttSR=1&Ntt=gaba

It is somewhat like when I had Benadryl (diphenhydramine)around and had an allergic reaction to an antifungal cream and took the Benadryl, the Doctors told me that I saved my own life by doing so!  I also would recommend that if you are very tired and or exhausted to never consume caffeine at that time!  Here is a link to a faster acting drug that works on the GABA system that the Doctors or emergency ward would prescribe.  But only you are going to know if you had too much energy drinks?

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/821863-medication#2

When you are younger you might not recognize the symptoms of a caffeine overdose.  A rapid type heart beat, etc. Find the list.  And the danger is also in the withdrawal from it as the blood vessels to the heart constrict? (not sure about what the exact mechanism of effect and danger is)


http://start.iminent.com/StartWeb/1033/toolbox/#q=overdosed%20on%20caffeine%20wrestler&s=web&p=1

The problem is that many of today's greasy foods don't go down well without a cola and they contain caffeine.

If even one person dies from a caffeine overdose, as happened above, it should be highly regulated!

And I believe that the elderly should not energy drinks which should really translate into the young not having them either!


Thomas Paul Murphy Copyright 2014
Originally published on 10 29 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com

My father was a Combat Medic in WWII and the Korean War and also a Tech 5.....


Instead of companies guilty of wrongful death being sued and put out of business the person who exercises their right to free speech and the truth is sued and bankrupted for life!  There isn't a more egregious violation of your Constitutional right to free speech than that?

They are going to want to raise primates and give you the stem cells from them in your brain 10 29 2014

They are going to want to raise primates and give you the stem cells from them in your brain  10 29 2014

Oddly enough this is right in line with the Book of Revelation there is a passage in there that has exactly this as a metaphor.  It is one thing if the coven talking to you takes the stem cells and another if they attempt to inject you with it!  Stem cell research might make sense to those who were born mentally defective with brain abnormalities, but that is not you and I who hear voices!  We were completely normal up to the age we graduated from college and ended up working for the beast that needs limited liability to shield its lack of responsible humanity.

And after they inject themselves and become normal what are the odds that they kill themselves when they realize how mean they were to normal people?

If you can remember how they stirred the brains of people with metal rods until they could no longer speak, never let them take you alive!

I.



II.  Some joker Facebooked me with stem cell research as the cure.  The cure is that which is talking to us should never be.  Don't ever let them give you a vaccine or other shot at the Doctor!

www.news.wisc.edu/21698

www.theguardian.com/science/2010/may/27/bone-marrow-transplants-mental-illness

www.nature.com/mp/journal/v18/n11/full/mp2013111a.html

www.schizophrenia.com/sznews/archives/004111.html

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130909152958.htm

uthscsa.edu/hscnews/singleformat2.asp?newID=4590

weill.cornell.edu/news/news/2014/05/brain-cell-transplants-reverse-psychosis-in-schizophrenic-mice-betsy-ross.html

timesofsandiego.com/tech/2014/09/11/ucsd-finds-chemical-cause-schizophrenia/

schizophrenia.com/?p=394

www.pnas.org/content/111/20/7450

www.jneurosci.org/content/34/29/9506.short

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23979606/

www.google.com/m?q=interneuron+stem+cell+therapy&client=ms-opera-mini&channel=new

www.google.com/m?q=neural+stem+cell+therapy&client=ms-opera-mini&channel=new



Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
Originally published on 10 29 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com
 

That voice that is nonsensical things to you all day 10 29 2014

That voice that is nonsensical things to you all day 10 29 2014

That voice that is nonsensical things to you all day is actually under the delusion that, "It is raising you to be its child."


Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy
originally published on 10 29 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Petition created 10 28 2014

Subject: For a rebate from the University of Wisconsin System
Hi,
That's enough of this!
That's why I created a petition to The Wisconsin State House, The Wisconsin State Senate, and 4 others.
Will you sign this petition? Click here:
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/for-a-rebate-from-the?source=c.em.cp&r_by=1206927
Thanks!

Interracial Porn is One Hundred percent black on whites 10 28 2014

Interracial Porn is One Hundred percent black on whites 10 28 2014


I do not view that stuff but I believe that very close to 100% of what you see there will be a black man having sex with a white woman. The Jews have the same gene halo-type as the black person. And curly haired Howard Stern once declared that the Jews control the porn industry (that means entirety as in child porn too!)

And I believe if you were to see a white man and a black woman the black woman would be dominating the white man perhaps even sodomizing him with a “prop.”

What am I getting at? Other than it just bothers me? It is a degradation of the white man as the image of God? And because Jews are promoting it, it means they like to view it?

It was the minister Farrakhan that stated that the White Race will become extinct because of low birth rate. He also believes in segregation and migration back to Africa.

Let's put it this way; it isn't the white middle class that is keeping the black population in poverty. It is that faction of organized crime that has the same gene halo-type as the black person!

What it goes back to in history are the Jews/Roman/Italians greatly objecting to a man of sound philosophy and logic such as the White Man Jew Jesus Christ? Is it men who have the minds of women liking to think of a certain perversion towards the degradation of white men and white women?

Now I used to think this way, the fact that more blacks are incarcerated than whites isn't fair. But when you look at who does drugs and who can't read, it just seems to make sense that more blacks are in prison than whites! I am not saying overtly that the races are not equal, I am just stating that maybe one really does commit more crimes and belongs in prison.

Another problem that I have is the white person without the black genotype being black balled and not getting ahead in the land of the free!

Am I a racist? I am to the point that I believe that everyone who hears voices is indeed a better race. Perhaps the race of the Prophets that was killed by the Jews in ancient history; both written in the Bible and more clearly in the Gospel of Barnabas that was not included in the Bible.

What was the religion that founded the United States? I'll give you a hint, they would have hung drug dealers, pimps and sexual molesters of children. They didn't like monkeying about to get ahead and be part of the wealth class.

I do not like it that the best looking white woman are objectified in this interglacial manner. When you look at what the Arab world does to women I compare this and find it very similar! And it leads to a very negative future for humanity.

So a young white woman seeks a career in Jewish dominated News Media and she is turned down because there are only so many spots. A few calls are made unbenounced to her. And all of a sudden some shady characters seem to be at the same place as her at the same time. And unknown to her she is manipulated into slavery as prostitution in the porn industry? And if she turns a cold shoulder she ends up homeless through another connection of bad circumstances?

What am I also declaring that when we hear voices we hear them from that which does not have its own human conscience or human reason but ours! I don't like it but I know its true so that is why I write it!
 
It just keeps getting worse and worse.  While I am typing this I here on the background television set that The University of Wisconsin is planning to create newborn primates.  Primate being a less than human.  If you read the Egyptian papyrus ebers you will see they already existed and perhaps they were held captive until they were nearly humanized?  Do the search for yourself if you don't believe me, I typed in this search term even though it is likely more just Madison and not Milwaukee.  uw milwaukee newborn primates
 
 
Some of us can't stand the sight of the birth defective already as they are a defiling of man as the image of God!
 
If you or your family member have ever heard voices you should be horrified by this.  Every college University in the United States should have its doors shuddered!  That's it!

While you are at it why don't you allow them to drink alcohol too and see if they become violent.  It was indeed the Druid Society of Great Britain that Winston Churchill was a member of.  The druids worship the monkey!  The Irish had a big problem with them as did the founders of this country.  The word Britain actually comes from Tattoo!  Think of that as you consider how much class the Royal Family really has.

They burnt all the books of the Irish!  I am willing to bet that in some foreign vaults some of those books exist today and are very telling about the English.  To such a point that they had to burn them in order to save face.  What was it that the Irish articulated very well that the Tattooed didn't want known?

Do you hear voices that prevented you from being successful in the United States?  Based on what I wrote here I am demanding that you receive a rebate for the full amount of tuition you paid plus interest at the highest rate charged in the United States. The rebate should also include a distribution of all University of Wisconsin surplus money to those who have heard voices in Wisconsin.  Also if a relative who heard voices in Wisconsin is deceased and went to school at a UW University they should be subject to inclusion in a dividing of that pot of United States Dollars, at last count $831 million.

We shouldn't be raising primates we should be taking every effort to ensure that the birth defective are never born.
 
 

Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy

originally published on 10 28 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com

Concealed Carry Issue 10 28 2014


Concealed Carry Issue 10 28 2014


On the news last night it told about how two young men were stopped at the airport because they had handguns in their backpacks. It brings up an important issue regarding young adults.

Are you telling me that someone who is forced to rent an apartment with roommates because they have a low paying job (etc.) , who likely drink alcohol and use drugs, is supposed to leave his handgun in the apartment (most of them don't even have doors on the individual bedrooms and if they do they are unlock-able) while he goes to church, court or on vacation by phone? Leaving it in that apartment would be one of the most irresponsible things he could do with it; and yet it is as if that is what he is forced to do because of the “No Guns Allowed” signs. You know the apathetic look and argument that follows with the roommate that took something; we see it on William Clinton's face every time he is asked a hard question.

One of the rules of handgun safety, (as it applies in the army or law enforcement) is to never give up your gun! You know as well as I that they steal exactly like that when someone leaves the apartment!

Should you ever have to leave it in a car in a bad neighborhood while patronizing a business in that neighborhood?

Guns are often passed down in family tradition from father to son; the best definition of someone who shouldn't have one is someone that would steal one! So a gun owner has a duty to prevent that from happening. And gun owners can be found liable if they have not secured their guns in their homes under various circumstances. But that issue does not address complete theft; as would likely happen in an apartment where there isn't like to be a large gun safe. It is just unrealistic that someone should ever be charged with a crime for taking a gun anywhere because of this!

And realistically your roomies are smoking pot and you call the police? What are they going to do about it? What is going to happen to you by them? Likely you could get hooked on those very same drugs because of the second hand smoke! You might even find yourself poisoned to death because of accidental ingestion or rather it being placed in your food (poisoned.) When was the last case of poisoning that ever came up in the news? You go to the doctor they will never diagnose it as that. To me every single use of illegal drugs and also alcohol and tobacco is an act of poisoning someone. I don't like lowlifes coming out of the woodwork and puffing anywhere near me in public. I don't like them using smoke machines down the block on Halloween either! You go to the Doctor they will never diagnose that sinus infection you have to pay $400 to have treated as being caused by second hand smoke!

Thomas Paul Murphy Copyright 2014
Originally published on 10 28 2014 at: www.themilwaukeeandwisconsinnews.blogspot.com



Affidavit that Neither Scott Walker or Mary Burke are qualified electors per U.S. Statute 6.03 (2)

10 28 2014

Affidavit that Neither Scott Walker or Mary Burke are qualified electors per U.S. Statute 6.03 (2)

Neither Scott Walker or Mary Burke are qualified electors per U.S. Statute 6.03 (2)


Sent to:
Municipal Court Clerk Linda Small of Whitefish Bay Wisconsin  small@wfbvillage.org

and

Kevin J. Kennedy Director and General Counsel

http://gab.wi.gov/about/staff
kevin.kennedy@wi.gov


Affidavit that Scott Walker and Mary Burk should not be registered to vote!  And are disqualified electors that cannot be on the Wisconsin Ballot for Governor.
Upon receipt of this challenge you are to mail a copy to both Scott Walker and Mary Burke that they have been challenged as an elector; and therefore challenged to be on the election ballot!

Neither Scott Walker or Mary Burke are qualified electors per U.S. Statute 6.03 (2)

http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/6/I/03

(2) No person shall be allowed to vote in any election in which the person has made or become interested, directly or indirectly, in any bet or wager depending upon the result of the election.

My interpretation of this statute is that all the money that pours in to back these candidates amounts to them being participant either directly or indirectly in a bet or wager depending upon the result of the election!

What is the spirit of that law?  so that you cannot buy a candidate into office?  They didn't want one to take a dive?  It looked like Tom Barrett took a dive in the race for Governor against Walker.  It also looks like Walker is taking a dive in this election as he answered the question about whether he would be able to fulfill the four years; he answered that in the vein that his wife had had enough of it!

That law is there to prevent special interests from buying their way into public policy!

At $10,000.oo a Commercial that is in effect indirect participation in a bet or wager!  Walker might have even used the terminology my constituents are betting on me to....


*****'

On the news the other night I believe it was Kahy MyKlby that stated a person had to register to be on the ballot to be a valid write in candidate.  That completely violates the spirit of that law.  The spirit of a law is the reason it was written!  The reason for a law being in place.  Neither Scott Walker nor Mary Burke are legally allowed to be on the ballot because of that very law; however a write in candidate isn't recognized unless they register to be on the ballot?  That is not why their is a write in space on the ballot!  In effect it is putting a write in space on the ballot to make it seem like you are maintaining elections in compliance with election law when the exact opposite is true!  The spirit of the write in candidate election law is that if both candidates are revealed to be corrupt the citizen can write in a candidate he/she knows without a shadow of a doubt isn't corrupt, the one who exposed them.  This mornings newspaper revealed that both candidates Mary Burke and Scott Walker accepted close to $10,000,0000.oo each of what can only be defined as special interest money because of the size of it, that invalidates them to be on the election ballot per U.S. Statute 6.03 (2).

So again if they can be on the ballot and are not supposed to then I will again write my own name in on the ballot!  I will also do so for Attorney General, and all the other write in spots on the ballot.  I "Thomas Paul Murphy" am in compliance with U.S. Statute 6.03 whereas Scott Walker and Mary Burke are not!  Those who accept Special Interest money, in the absence of donor information defined by the size of the contribution cannot be on the ballot!  It is the equivalent of placing a bet on them!  They were registered to be on the ballot whereas they cannot be! Election laws are being willfully violated in the United States!



Here is the procedure for disqualifying them to be on that ballot!

6.03 Disqualification of electors.
(1) The following persons shall not be allowed to vote in any election and any attempt to vote shall be rejected:
(a) Any person who is incapable of understanding the objective of the elective process or who is under guardianship, unless the court has determined that the person is competent to exercise the right to vote.
(b) Any person convicted of treason, felony or bribery, unless the person's right to vote is restored through a pardon or under s. 304.078 (3).
(2) No person shall be allowed to vote in any election in which the person has made or become interested, directly or indirectly, in any bet or wager depending upon the result of the election.
6.03(3) (3) No person may be denied the right to register to vote or the right to vote by reason that the person is alleged to be incapable of understanding the objective of the elective process unless the person has been adjudicated incompetent in this state. If a determination of incompetency of the person has already been made, or if a determination of limited incompetency has been made that does not include a specific finding that the subject is competent to exercise the right to vote, and a guardian has been appointed as a result of any such determination, then no determination of incapacity of understanding the objective of the elective process is required unless the guardianship is terminated or modified under s. 54.64.
History: 1973 c. 284; 1977 c. 26, 394; 1979 c. 110; 1991 a. 316; 2003 a. 121; 2005 a. 149, 387; 2007 a. 97; s. 35.17 correction in (1) (a).
Disenfranchisement of felons does not deny them equal protection. Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24.
 
 
 
 
6.48 Challenging registration.
(1) General procedure.
6.48(1)(a)(a) Any registered elector of a municipality may challenge the registration of any other registered elector by submitting to the municipal clerk or executive director of the board of election commissioners in cities of more than 500,000 population an affidavit stating that the elector is not qualified to vote and the reasons therefor. The clerk or director, upon receipt of the affidavit, shall mail a notification of the challenge to the challenged elector, at his or her registered address.
(b) The challenged and challenging electors shall appear before the municipal clerk within one week of notification or arrange under sub. (2) to appear before the board of election commissioners. The challenging elector shall make an affidavit answering any questions necessary to determine the challenged elector's qualifications. Judgment rests with the municipal clerk and decisions shall be rendered as soon as heard. If the clerk cannot resolve the issue or has reservations as to the answers, the clerk may require the challenging elector to take the oath under s. 6.925. If the challenged elector appears and contests any answer of the challenging elector, the clerk may require the challenged elector to take the oath under s. 6.94 and to answer any question necessary to determine the challenged elector's qualifications. If the challenging elector appears before the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners but the challenged elector fails to appear, such clerk or board may make the decision without consulting the challenged elector. If the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners does not sustain the challenge, the challenged elector's registration remains valid.
(c) If the challenging elector fails to appear before the municipal clerk within one week or in cities of more than 500,000 population fails to appear before the board of election commissioners under sub. (2) to answer questions and take the oath under s. 6.925, such clerk or board shall cancel the challenge.
(d) If the clerk determines that the challenged elector is not qualified, the clerk shall change the challenged elector's registration from eligible to ineligible status on the registration list and notify the inspectors for the ward or election district where the elector was registered.
(2)Special procedure in populous cities.
(a) In cities of more than 500,000 population, objections may be made before the board of election commissioners which shall sit on the last Wednesday before each election from 9 a.m. to 12 a.m. and from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. to hear objections then made or deferred under sub. (1). If all the objections cannot then be determined, the commissioners shall sit during the same hours the next day.
(b) Upon appearing in person, objectors shall be examined, under oath, by the commissioners and testimony taken. Judgment rests with the board of election commissioners and decisions shall be rendered as soon as heard. All cases are heard and decided summarily. The commissioners shall determine whether the person objected to is qualified. If they determine that a person is not qualified, the executive director of the board of election commissioners shall change the elector from eligible to ineligible status on the registration list and shall notify the proper ward officials of the change immediately.
(3)Challenge based on incompetency. Section 6.03 (3) applies to any challenge which is made to registration based on an allegation that an elector is incapable of understanding the objective of the elective process and thereby ineligible for registration.
(4)Disqualification. The municipal clerk or board of election commissioners may not disqualify an elector under this section except upon the grounds and in accordance with the procedure specified in s. 6.325.
 
 
 
The spirit of the law is more important that the procedure for compliance with those who seek to thwart the spirit of the law.
 
 
Challenged by:
 
Thomas Paul Murphy
4964 N. Marlborough Dr.
Whitefish Bay WI 53217
 
 

Copyright 2014 Thomas Paul Murphy